Working Capital Hub - Insights - Working Capital Setpoint

The Operating Working Capital Setpoint: Finding the Sweet Spot Between Cash, Growth, and Resilience

Working Capital Hub - Post Image - F

The Operating Working Capital Setpoint - Table of Contents

A core element of Lean Operating Working Capital is understanding that sustainable improvement cannot be achieved through isolated, function-specific initiatives.

Setpoint thinking only becomes real when it is embedded across the company’s core value streams – Order to Cash (OTC), Forecast to Fulfil (FTF), and Procure to Pay (PTP).

Want to download this article for free?

Create a free account on My Academy Hub to download the article The Operating Working Capital Setpoint: Finding the Sweet Spot Between Cash, Growth, and Resilience today.

Operating Working Capital Setpoint - Key Take Aways

  • Working capital is strategic – not housekeeping. Trillions remain trapped globally, but can be released to fuel growth, resilience, and competitiveness.
  • The OWC Setpoint defines “what good looks like” – the sweet spot between efficiency and effectiveness. It is not about starving the business but operating at optimal flow.
  • Every Setpoint is unique. It reflects real supply chain conditions – lead time, capacity, complexity, and predictability – as well as industry, seasonality, and growth ambition.
  • True Setpoints are calculated from transaction-level reality, not imposed from balance sheet targets. When data exposes constraints, leaders can improve structure – not just pressure metrics.
  • Each component (Inventory, Receivables, Payables) has its own Setpoint, but only calibration across OTC, FTF, and PTP creates enterprise-level equilibrium and control.
  • Setpoint thinking demands cross-functional governance. When Finance, Operations, Supply Chain, and Commercial teams act in unison, working capital becomes a frontline enabler – improving liquidity, cost, service, and growth capacity simultaneously.

Working Capital: The Strategic Battleground

Working Capital has shifted from a financial housekeeping item to a frontline driver of competitive advantage.

As revealed in J.P. Morgan’s Working Capital Index 2024, S&P 1500 companies are facing an alarming slowdown in working capital efficiency:

  • The cash conversion cycle (CCC) has stretched by 2.4 days.
  • Rising DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) and DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) are the culprits.
  • The result? $707 billion in trapped liquidity – a painful 40% rise from pre-pandemic levels.

This is not a one-off. The Hackett Group’s 2025 survey shows U.S. corporates are leaving $1.7 trillion in liquidity untapped. Meanwhile, PwC’s 2024/25 study highlights €1.56 trillion in excess working capital locked across European balance sheets.

These numbers are staggering – but they are also an opportunity. Companies that treat working capital and liquidity as a strategic lever – not a by-product – will set the pace for tomorrow.

Working Capital Hub - Insights - Working Capital Setpoint - Image 1

Want to go beyond the basics?

Become a Certified Working Capital Expert with our accredited course Managing Working Capital

From Reactive to Strategic

The surface stability in working capital metrics hides a deeper truth:

  • Companies that remain reactive – slashing inventories, collecting harder or squeezing suppliers when crises hit – risk eroding resilience and competitiveness.
  • Those that embed working capital and cashflow discipline into culture, technology, and partnerships are building lasting advantage.

The winners won’t be those who starve their supply chains, but those who:

  • Collaborate smarter across ecosystems.
  • Break down silos between finance, operations, and procurement.
  • Equip teams with digital tools and a mindset where every euro of working capital serves a purpose.

In this context, AI is emerging as a game-changer – helping organizations surface real-time insights from their transactional data, from predicting late payments to fine-tuning demand forecasts.

Yet, systems and data can only take you so far. To truly capture the benefits, companies must also understand their core OWC requirements – their Setpoint. Without this calibration, even the smartest algorithms risk optimizing in the wrong direction.

Working Capital Hub - Post Image - B

Introducing Lean Operating Working Capital and the Setpoint Approach

The philosophy of Lean OWC draws on Lean Manufacturing: eliminate waste, make every resource work productively, and design systems that deliver maximum value with minimum friction.

It challenges five persistent operating working capital misconceptions:

  • “OWC competes with profitability.” The reality is the opposite. Lean OWC fuels profitability by freeing trapped cash, reducing financing costs, and improving margins.
  • “Less is always better.” Cutting too far creates firefighting: stockouts, broken production schedules, costly overnight shipments. The goal isn’t the lowest OWC – it’s the right OWC.
  • “Working capital is reactive.” Many firms only act when liquidity is tight or debt repayment looms. Lean OWC is about managing proactively, so shocks can be absorbed before they hit.
  • “It’s finance’s problem.” Most of the cash conversion cycle lives in operations and supply chain. Finance may measure OWC, but operations shape it daily.
  • “It’s about isolated fixes.” Tweaking payables or receivables while ignoring inventories rarely helps. As the Theory of Constraints reminds us: optimizing one part of the system in isolation often undermines the performance of the whole.

At its core, Lean OWC is not about cutting harder. It is about finding balance – the right level of capital that sustains operations, protects resilience, and still releases cash for growth.

That right level is the Operating Working Capital Setpoint.

Working Capital Hub - Post Image - G

What Is the Operating Working Capital Setpoint?

Think of the Operating Working Capital Setpoint as a company’s financial equilibrium. It’s the balance where efficiency and effectiveness meet:

  • Efficiency: capital is not wasted – receivables turn quickly, payables are well-structured, inventories flow smoothly.
  • Effectiveness: capital actively supports operations, customers, and suppliers where it matters most.

The Setpoint is not about chasing extremes:

  • Setpoint ≠ the lowest possible OWC. Starving below Setpoint erodes resilience, squeezes partners, and undermines service.
  • Setpoint ≠ the highest buffer-heavy OWC. Excess hides inefficiencies, locks up cash, and reduces agility.

Many companies swing between “just in time” (running with the thinnest buffers possible) and “just in case” (stockpiling inventory and stretching receivables to feel safe).

Both extremes come at a cost:

  • Just in time without discipline quickly becomes “just too risky” – exposing cracks in supply chains.
  • Just in case often ends up as “just too much” – hiding inefficiencies and trapping cash.

The Operating Working Capital Setpoint is the smarter middle ground: “just enough, just right” – lean enough to free up cash, but robust enough to keep customers, suppliers, and operations running smoothly.

Working Capital Hub - Insights - Working Capital Setpoint

What Shapes a Company’s Operating Working Capital Setpoint?

Your Operating Working Capital Setpoint isn’t a one-size-fits-all number. It reflects the structural conditions and inherent constraints of your supply chain, and how efficiently you operate within them.

Four fundamental forces – Lead Time, Capacity, Complexity, and Predictability – determine how much operating working capital a business truly needs to run smoothly.

Supply Chain Conditions & Constraints that shape OWC requirements:

1. Lead Time – The Primary Driver of Working Capital

  • Lead time covers every step in the value chain: sourcing materials, manufacturing products, delivering goods, billing customers, and receiving cash.
  • The longer these cycles take, the more working capital must be held to bridge the gap between outflows and inflows.
  • Long lead times often stem from global supply bases, unreliable logistics, manual processes, or slow financial settlements.
  • Conversely, shorter and more predictable lead times reduce the need for buffers, freeing capital and increasing agility.
  • In a mature Setpoint discipline, managing lead time is not an operational convenience – it is a financial strategy.

2. Capacity – The Limits of Throughput

  • Capacity defines how much your operation can produce or fulfil within a given period.
  • When capacity is constrained, organizations often compensate by holding excess inventory or accelerating procurement to protect service levels – unintentionally inflating working capital.
  • Effective capacity management – through flexible labour models, load balancing, outsourcing, automation, or scheduling discipline – allows companies to meet demand without resorting to capital-heavy buffers.
  • A realistic Setpoint must reflect the true productive capacity of the organization, not theoretical peaks.

3. Complexity – The Hidden Cost of Variety

  • Every SKU, customer exception, location, or process variation introduces complexity.
  • This complexity drives variability – and variability demands capital.
  • Large product portfolios, fragmented networks, and custom terms force businesses to carry additional stock, longer terms, or manual workarounds. The goal is not to eliminate complexity, but to manage it intentionally.
  • Strategic complexity (to differentiate or customize) should be preserved. Wasteful complexity should be designed out.
  • A clean operating model lowers the Setpoint naturally, without financial pressure.

4. Predictability – Confidence Reduces Capital

  • Predictability is the ability to anticipate what will happen – demand patterns, supplier deliveries, production output, or payment behavior.
  • Low predictability forces organizations to hold working capital “just in case.” High predictability allows them to operate with precision.
  • Predictability improves through collaboration, reliable planning, real-time visibility, and predictive analytics.
  • When a business can plan with confidence, it replaces capital buffers with process discipline.
  • The Setpoint becomes a reflection of trust – in data, in partners, and in capability.

Together, these four forces determine how much operating working capital is structurally required to support operations at any given time.

Improving them does not just lower the Setpoint – it strengthens resilience, reduces waste, and creates a competitive advantage that finance alone cannot deliver.

Working capital Hub - Insights - Operating Working Capital Setpoint

Why Quality of the Operating Working Capital Setpoint Matters

The Setpoint is not just about the number – it’s also about the quality of what sits inside.

Consider a company with high levels of obsolete or slow-moving stock while constantly running short of fast-moving items. On paper, its OWC might look “in range.” In practice, the reality is painful:

  • Customers face stockouts.
  • Operations scramble with costly expedited shipments.
  • Sales are lost.

To protect itself, the company adds more inventory “just in case,” which pushes OWC above its true Setpoint – locking in even more waste.

This is why Setpoint quality is critical. It’s not about how much you carry, but whether you carry the right things, in the right place, at the right time. Only then does working capital truly support growth, resilience, and profitability.

Working Capital Hub - Case Example

Case example: How a Hidden Lead Time Constraint Shifted the Setpoint

NorthAxis, a global industrial manufacturer, believed it was operating efficiently with 62 days of inventory. Finance launched a cash-release initiative, targeting a 10% reduction – expecting €40M to be freed.

Within weeks, service levels deteriorated. Expedite shipments surged.

Customers complained. Instead of unlocking liquidity, the company burned more cash protecting it. The problem wasn’t leadership discipline – it was a mis calibrated Setpoint.

A cross-functional review revealed four structural truths:

  • Lead Time: A key Asian supplier’s true replenishment cycle had quietly slipped from 42 to 68 days, due to port congestion and customs delays.
  • Capacity: A bottleneck in final assembly created stop-start production, forcing planners to hold safety stock as insurance.
  • Complexity: Of 1,800 active SKUs, only 400 drove 75% of demand – yet all were treated equally in planning parameters.
  • Predictability: Forecast accuracy had fallen from 82% to 61%, particularly during new product launches, increasing working capital buffers.

When NorthAxis recalculated its true Setpoint, it didn’t slash inventory – it rebalanced it.

Obsolete and low-velocity stock was cleared, buffers were redeployed to critical items, supplier terms were renegotiated, and capacity smoothing replaced panic planning.

The impact:

  • Inventory reduced by 9 days
  • Service levels improved by 4%
  • €28M in cash was released – sustainably, without disruption or trust erosion

Lesson: 

Operating working capital cannot be forced down through financial targets alone. The Setpoint only moves when the structural constraints that define it – Lead Time, Capacity, Complexity, Predictability – are addressed.

The Working Capital Setpoint as a Diagnostic Lens

Working Capital Hub - Insights - Japanese Sea

Operating Working Capital is more than a few lines on the balance sheet – it’s a diagnostic tool.

By understanding your optimal level of operating working capital – the Setpoint – companies can detect performance gaps early. Elevated OWC above the Setpoint often signals hidden inefficiencies, such as:

  • Excess inventory acting as a crutch for poor forecasting or supplier unreliability.
  • Long receivables cycles hiding weak credit policies or misaligned customer terms.
  • Unbalanced payables reflecting short-term cash grabs that strain supplier health.

Inefficient processes inflate OWC. Inaccurate forecasts, last-minute production changes, and poor supplier performance all force companies to hold more buffers than they should.

Lean thinkers often explain this using the Japanese Sea analogy: water levels (inventory) hide the rocks (process problems). Lower the water without removing the rocks and ships get stranded.

OWC works the same way:

  • Too much inventory “covers up” broken processes.
  • Too little exposes rocks so harshly that ships (operations) run aground.

These buffers may provide temporary relief, but they mask root causes and create complacency.

By contrast, knowing your company’s Operating Working Capital Setpoint helps you separate symptoms from causes – and focus improvements where they matter most.

Without this calibration, OWC programs are like running in the dark: you may move quickly, but in the wrong direction – cutting too deep, or in the wrong places, creating new inefficiencies and ultimately rebuilding buffers at even higher levels than before.

Working Capital Hub - Post Image - E

Finding the Right Operating Working Capital Setpoint: Incremental vs. Structural

Once you’ve identified where your company stands relative to its Operating Working Capital Setpoint, the next step is deciding how to move closer to it. Companies generally have two pathways:

Incremental improvements

  • Closing the gap between current performance and the defined Setpoint.
  • Driven by process discipline, better forecasting, and operational “housekeeping.”
  • Example: improving demand planning accuracy to reduce excess buffers.

Structural improvements

  • Shifting the Setpoint itself by changing the way the business operates.
  • Driven by redesigns of supply chains, footprints, or commercial models.
  • Examples: adopting AI-based demand planning, moving production closer to markets, or renegotiating fundamental contract terms.

Both approaches matter. Incremental keeps you on track in the short term; structural reshapes what “good” looks like in the long term.

Analogy: Think of it like fitness:

  • Incremental improvements are daily habits – eating better, walking more.
  • Structural improvements are lifestyle changes – switching careers for less stress, moving to a healthier environment.
  • Together, they set your “baseline” health higher and keep you performing at your best.
Working Capital Hub - Post Image - A

Working Capital Setpoint Across OWC Components

The good news is that an Operating Working Capital Setpoint is not a matter of opinion or executive decree – it can be objectively calculated.

Unlike top-down targets pulled from the balance sheet, a true Setpoint is derived from transaction-level data that reflects how the business actually operates.

Each major component of OWC has its own Setpoint:

Inventory Setpoint

The Inventory Setpoint is calculated at the most granular level – by SKU – and is anchored in active planning parameters such as:

  • Replenishment lead times
  • Demand profiles and variability
  • Minimum order or production quantities
  • Safety stock requirements
  • Target service levels

Because these factors vary across products, geographies, and supply chains, different business units or product lines will naturally operate with different inventory Setpoints. There is no single “right” number across the enterprise.

But the calculation is only the beginning. The Inventory Setpoint provides three critical insights:

  • Are we carrying the right mix? Excess slow-moving or obsolete stock inflates OWC without protecting service.
  • Are we protecting where it matters? Buffers should secure availability for high-value, high-demand products – not tie up capital in the wrong places.
  • Are supply chain inefficiencies forcing hidden buffers? Poor forecasts, unreliable suppliers, or last-minute schedule changes often inflate inventories above their true Setpoint.

Example:

  • A consumer electronics company discovers it is carrying 90 days of stock – but half of it is slow-moving. Meanwhile, bestsellers run out regularly, triggering expedited shipments and lost sales.
  • On paper, OWC looks “within range.” In practice, the company is well above its true Setpoint — because the quality of inventory is misaligned with demand.

The Inventory Setpoint therefore becomes a calibration tool: ensuring that working capital is not just minimized, but positioned correctly – the right products, in the right place, at the right time.

Receivables Setpoint

If inventory defines the buffers you hold, receivables determine how quickly cash flows back in.

The Receivables Setpoint is anchored in contractual customer payment terms and can be calculated objectively:

  • Based on the weighted average of contractual terms across all sales transactions over the last 12 months.
  • Enhanced by comparing those contractual terms to how customers actually pay in practice.

This analysis does more than set a baseline. It uncovers three critical insights:

  • Are the right terms applied? Misaligned or inconsistent terms across customers often reflect legacy negotiations or a lack of policy discipline.
  • Are customers honouring those terms? Persistent delays beyond contract terms may point to weak credit policies, ineffective collections, or hidden supply chain leverage.
  • Is working capital supporting growth or stifling it? Overly generous terms may trap liquidity, while overly strict terms can choke customer relationships and constrain sales.

Example:

  • A company offering 30-day terms across its customer base might discover that the effective weighted average is closer to 42 days, due to a mix of “special deals”. The effect is further enhanced by systematic late payers.
  • That gap is pure trapped cash – and a clear sign the company is operating above its Receivables Setpoint.

The Receivables Setpoint therefore becomes a calibration tool: not just to set realistic liquidity expectations, but to align commercial policy, customer relationships, and growth strategy with financial discipline.

Payables Setpoint

And payables complete the cycle – showing how long cash stays in the business before it flows out again.

The Payables Setpoint is defined by contractual supplier terms and actual payment practices. It can be calculated objectively as:

  • The weighted average of contractual supplier payment terms across all purchasing transactions over the last 12 months.
  • Adjusted for how suppliers are actually being paid – on time, early, or late.

But the value of this calculation goes beyond establishing a baseline. It answers three key questions:

  • Are we aligned with supplier agreements? A gap between contracted terms and actual payment behaviour may signal process inefficiencies or cash flow pressure.
  • Are we building resilience or eroding it? Sustainable payables strategies strengthen supplier relationships; aggressive stretching risks supply disruption, hidden cost premiums, or reputational damage.
  • Are we using payables as a lever for working capital or as a substitute for discipline? Delaying payments to mask liquidity pressure is not the same as optimizing OWC.

Example:

  • A company with average contractual supplier terms of 45 days discovers its actual weighted average is 35 days, due to systematic misapplication of terms
  • On the surface, this looks harmless – even “supplier friendly.” But in reality, it traps cash unnecessarily and signals weak process discipline. Over time, it erodes the company’s liquidity position and limits flexibility for investment and growth.

The Payables Setpoint, when properly understood, provides a calibration tool: ensuring that payables practices free up cash without compromising supplier trust – striking the right balance between liquidity, competitiveness, and long-term supply chain stability.

Bringing It All Together

Each Operating Working Capital component has its own Setpoint, and different business units may operate with different baselines depending on their supply chain conditions. But taken together, they create the company’s overall Operating Working Capital Setpoint.

Just as no single supply chain process defines performance, no single component defines OWC. Only by calibrating inventory, receivables, and payables in unison can companies establish their true financial equilibrium – one that frees cash productively, sustains relationships, and strengthens resilience.

From Metrics to Flow: Embedding the Setpoint Across OTC, FTF, and PTP

A core element of Lean Operating Working Capital is understanding that sustainable improvement cannot be achieved through isolated, function-specific initiatives.

Setpoint thinking only becomes real when it is embedded across the company’s core value streams – Order to Cash (OTC), Forecast to Fulfil (FTF), and Procure to Pay (PTP).

Working Capital Hub - Overview Purchase to Pay - Forecast to Fulfill - Order to Cash

These end-to-end processes are where working capital actually lives:

  • Inventory is shaped in FTF
  • Receivables are created in OTC
  • Payables are negotiated in PTP

If improvements are made in only one pillar – squeezing suppliers in PTP, reducing stock in FTF, accelerating collections in OTC – the result is predictable: disruption, resistance, and a short-lived Hawthorne effect.

  • “A core element of the lean operating working capital methodology is the understanding that sustained improvements must come from process-driven and holistic initiatives, avoiding the trap of local optimizations. When organizations chase isolated targets, they fall into whack-a-mole dynamics – solving a problem in one function only to create a new one elsewhere”.

It’s important to recognize that these frictions do more than inflate operating working capital – they quietly erode the entire operating model.

Local interventions taken without end-to-end alignment don’t just trap cash; they drive up process costs, create operational firefighting, and undermine growth potential.

Excess buffers mask inefficiencies, service disruptions weaken customer trust, and reactive decisions strain supplier relationships. In other words, when operating working capital is managed in isolation, companies don’t just lose liquidity – they sacrifice competitiveness.

  • “When working capital is misaligned, it’s not just cash that suffers – cost, service, and growth all pay the price.”

By maintaining a cross-functional, process-led approach, companies build trust and secure true ownership of outcomes. Instead of focusing on symptoms (levels of DIO, DSO, DPO), teams align on root causes within transaction flows – terms, planning parameters, lead times, constraints.

This transforms Setpoint from a financial benchmark into a shared operational standard. Setpoint becomes the question every team must ask inside OTC, FTF, and PTP:

  • “Are we operating at our optimal level – not just for our function, but for the flow of the enterprise?”

In Conclusion: Why the Operating Working Capital Setpoint Matters

The Operating Working Capital Setpoint isn’t just a financial benchmark – it is a strategic lens for how a business truly operates. It forces leaders to look beyond balance sheet metrics and confront the structural realities that shape performance: lead times, capacity limits, product complexity, and planning predictability.

  • A well-calibrated Setpoint does more than free cash. It exposes process inefficiencies, prevents hidden cost leakage, protects service quality, and enables growth without strain. It ensures working capital is not a reaction to pressure, but a reflection of operational maturity.

By anchoring operating working capital in the flow of core processes – OTC, FTF, and PTP – Setpoint thinking replaces one-time targets with a shared operational standard. It prevents the two great mistakes: starving the business in pursuit of cash, or masking inefficiency through excess.

In the end, the Setpoint helps leaders answer not just “What does good look like?” — but a far more powerful question:

  • “How do we design a business that runs so well, it naturally needs less capital to grow?”

Companies that embed this discipline don’t just optimize liquidity.

They build resilience, accelerate growth, and compete with precision.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Setpoint is the optimal level of working capital where efficiency and effectiveness meet. It’s not the lowest possible level, nor the highest buffer-heavy position - but the “just enough, just right” point that balances resilience, liquidity, and growth.

Unlike top-down balance sheet targets, the Setpoint is derived from transaction-level data. Each component - inventory, receivables, and payables - has its own Setpoint based on contractual terms, planning parameters, and supply chain conditions. Together, they create the enterprise-level equilibrium.

No. A company’s Setpoint depends on its industry, supply chain structure, seasonality, growth rate, and operational efficiency. Even within a single company, different business units may have different Setpoints.

Traditional targets often push companies to cut too deep or carry too much. The Setpoint removes guesswork and bias, showing what good looks like for your specific context - and ensuring that improvements don’t undermine resilience or growth.

By treating it as both a diagnostic tool (to uncover inefficiencies) and a strategic guide (to align finance, operations, and supply chain). Leaders can use the Setpoint to set realistic targets, direct improvement programs, and turn working capital into a competitive advantage.

Working Capital Hub - logotype

Ready to take the next step?

Turn theory into practice and boost your career with accredited training. Become a Certified Working Capital Expert by enrolling in our flagship course: Managing Working Capital.

Categories

Categories

If You Liked This, Explore More Thought Leadership Articles Here

FinProdAI Thought Leadership - AI Powered Credit Analysis

AI-Powered Credit Analysis: How Automation and Software Are Transforming B2B Lending

AI is transforming credit analysis - not by replacing analysts, but by removing the manual work that slows decisions and traps capital in receivables. It’s not credit analysis that harms
Working Capital Hub - If Working Capital Won't Improve You're Battling Bias - Not Constraints

If Working Capital Won’t Improve, You’re Battling Bias – Not Constraints

Many companies don’t struggle with operating working capital because of poor forecasts or long lead times. They struggle because of Supply Chain Bias - the hidden force of assumptions, incentives,
Last 8 of Supply Chains - Where Bias and Avoidance Undermine Performance

The “Last 8%” of Supply Chains: Where Bias and Avoidance Undermine Performance

The “last 8%” problem, as described by JP Pawliw, refers to the critical conversations and decisions teams routinely avoid - stopping just short of addressing the hardest truths. This dynamic

Author

author avatar
Alexander Flach
Index